The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a significant decision regarding the Second Amendment, creating a conflict with the 2nd Circuit on the issue of gun carry on private property open to the public. The 9th Circuit ruled that the state can flip the default rule for gun carry on such properties, while the 2nd Circuit has ruled otherwise. This decision has implications for property and land use, particularly in how an owner's right to exclude interacts with others' desires to carry firearms. The case, May v. Bonta, marks the first lasting win for the 9th Circuit in striking down a gun law, even in part. Additionally, the decision touches on sensitive-places and has implications for California CCW regulations.
"Put bluntly, the immunity conferred by the court majority moves the United States closer to becoming a criminal regime," writes Paul Pillar. https://t.co/ajlLfm6ljl
In my frustration with the parts we didn't win on in May v. Bonta, I forgot to notice that this is probably the first 9th circuit lasting win on a Second Amendment case striking down a gun law, even in part. I say lasting, because given the partisan makeup of this particular…
Update on California CCW Court Case - You might not like it. https://t.co/AMdaXftgal