Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
Lawyer's association rights violated by mandatory bar, but remedy "need not be drastic," appeals court says. https://t.co/8GTzYClJJv #FirstAmendment
A 9th Circuit panel said Oregon State Bar officials violated the constitutional rights of Daniel Crowe, a conservative lawyer, by publishing a statement critical of then-President Trump in a magazine funded by members’ mandatory dues in 2018. Read more: https://t.co/OWTBUimuhO https://t.co/qpf3Rp0zNo
A U.S. appeals court said Oregon State Bar officials violated a conservative lawyer's constitutional rights by publishing a statement critical of then-President Donald Trump in a magazine funded by the mandatory dues paid by members @DanWiessner https://t.co/11TwAlffRC https://t.co/XvIhRjraQQ
A U.S. appeals court has ruled that the Oregon State Bar officials violated the constitutional rights of Daniel Crowe, a conservative lawyer, by publishing a statement critical of then-President Donald Trump in a magazine funded by mandatory dues paid by its members in 2018. The 9th Circuit Court found that this action infringed on Crowe's freedom of association. The court noted that while the violation occurred, the remedy for this infraction need not be drastic.
