A company known for its controversial practices of repurposing intellectual property (IP) has accused a competitor of similar actions. This competitor reportedly engages in the same methods of recombining and reusing IP but at a lower cost. Observers have noted the irony of the situation, considering the original company's history of not adequately compensating creators for their work. The discourse around this issue highlights ongoing tensions in the industry regarding IP rights and ethical practices.
"In short: a company that made its name regurgitating and recombining sliced-up bits of intellectual property in statistically probable ways without due compensation is now threatened by … another company apparently doing the same, at lower cost." https://t.co/KnKqDGubc0
This is GOLD. “A company that made its name regurgitating & recombining sliced-up bits of intellectual property w/out due compensation is now threatened by… another company doing the same, at lower cost. Karma is a bitch.” - @GaryMarcus https://t.co/K2xLxPjchW
A company that made its name regurgitating and recombining sliced-up bits of intellectual property in statistically probable ways without due compensation is now threatened by … another company apparently doing the same, at lower cost. https://t.co/e6UuQZFVau