A federal judge in Maryland has upheld the United States Naval Academy's policy of considering race in its admissions process, citing a compelling national security interest in promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within the military. This ruling, delivered by Judge Richard Bennett, contrasts with the recent Supreme Court decision that struck down affirmative action in university admissions. The judge's decision is seen as a significant setback for the anti-affirmative action group, Students for Fair Admissions, which had successfully challenged similar practices at civilian institutions. The ruling underscores the Naval Academy's argument that its race-conscious admissions policy enhances national security by fostering a diverse officer corps. The decision has sparked debate over the legality and ethics of race-based admissions in military academies, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's stance on such policies in higher education.
Educational institutions are engaging in illegal racial balancing and other evasions of SFFA v Harvard. As after Brown v. Board, the Court will have to police this massive resistance to the prohibition on racial discrimination in education. It should do so sooner not later. https://t.co/WM0dvwYaPp
The US Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in university admissions. Now a federal district court has upheld essentially the same practice as used by the US Naval Academy. @NoahRFeldman says the ruling isn't inconsistent https://t.co/ad03VliQj5
RACISM: White high school graduated are discouraged from attending the Naval Academy as a result of the Navy's open policy of racial discrimination. A federal judge ruled that the policy was legal. Judge Richard Bennett upheld the United States Naval Academy's policy of… https://t.co/A7lC2iDwHx