Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
This is why we can’t have nice things. CA has to satisfy every niche group with bureaucracy. There’s an awesome project to re-light up the bay bridge & a lawsuit has been brought against it bc it will discriminate against people who can’t tolerate the intensity of LED lights. https://t.co/oy2iVEfG3l https://t.co/8407s8MeyU
A lawsuit filed by Mark Baker of the Soft Lights Foundation alleges that the Bay Lights 360 project poses significant environmental and neurological hazards. 📝: https://t.co/wwtIbWFzoh https://t.co/Ag20vzLe3e
An LED conspiracy theory org @softlights_org is abusing CEQA and suing to try to block the Bay Bridge lights. Kafka couldn't have imagined California governance in his wildest dreams. https://t.co/KyLsrg7Z23
A lawsuit has been filed by Mark Baker of the Soft Lights Foundation against the Bay Lights 360 project, which aims to make the LED light installation on the San Francisco Bay Bridge permanent. The lawsuit claims that the project poses environmental and neurological hazards, with Baker asserting that the lights could lead to suicidal thoughts among sensitive individuals. The controversy surrounding the project has drawn attention to the broader implications of California's environmental regulations, particularly the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Critics have expressed frustration over the legal challenges to the installation, which is intended to enhance the iconic bridge's aesthetics.
