
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is facing criticism for its use of the term 'crypto asset security,' which legal experts argue has no basis in law. The SEC's ambiguous stance on crypto transactions has drawn ire from Coinbase's chief legal officer and Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty. Alderoty asserts that the term is fabricated and misleading. Additionally, a judge in the Kraken case has also questioned the SEC's undefined terminology. This controversy follows the SEC's recent actions, including dropping enforcement against Paxos and losing a motion to dismiss (MTD) against Binance in July. Critics also highlight the SEC's jurisdictional overreach and its assertion that bankruptcy assets may be considered 'crypto asset securities.'
By the SEC’s own assertions qualified custody doesn’t exist in crypto, so not sure what anyone is supposed to do here https://t.co/8ZwIorjn7Q
Guess holding crypto on exchanges is considered a custody failure WTF are market makers supposed to do Surely this is just bullshit right https://t.co/c6ESZfdTLF
Their 'custody failure' was holding funds in ftx?? Capital held certain crypto assets in online trading accounts on crypto asset trading platforms, including FTX Trading Ltd., that were not qualified custodians. https://t.co/705BlXUmy1

