Starbucks is currently contesting a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruling that mandates the company to bargain with Workers United under the new Cemex standard. This ruling marks a significant shift in labor relations precedents. In a federal appeals court, arguments presented by Starbucks regarding the NLRB's authority to impose monetary compensation for unfair labor practices have resulted in a divided opinion among judges. A three-judge panel of the 6th Circuit is particularly split over whether the NLRB possesses the power to require employers to reimburse workers for expenses incurred due to illegal firings. Legal experts are observing these developments closely, as they may have far-reaching implications for labor negotiations and employer responsibilities.