On December 9, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court engaged in oral arguments concerning two significant cases. The first case, Kousisis v. United States, examines whether deception to induce a commercial exchange can be classified as mail or wire fraud, regardless of whether the scheme's objective was to inflict economic harm on the victim. The second case, Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, addresses the eligibility of federal civilian employees called to active duty during a national emergency for differential pay, even if their duties are not directly related to the emergency. Preliminary indications suggest the Supreme Court may favor the reservists in the Feliciano case, potentially requiring the government to compensate federal employees at their civilian salary rates when activated for military service.
The US Supreme Court seemed likely to side with reservists and say that the government must pay federal employees called up for active duty the same salary as they receive doing their civilian jobs. https://t.co/6YAI7gKIaM
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Feliciano v. Dept. of Transportation, a case of whether a federal civilian employee called to active duty during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay, even if the duty isn’t related to the emergency – LIVE at 11am ET online here:… https://t.co/Te1QFdA55Z
LISTEN LIVE: Supreme court hears cases about wire fraud and federal employee compensation https://t.co/fUFYug6ciq