The U.S. Supreme Court has denied a nurse's request to eliminate a longstanding legal doctrine that prevents lawsuits involving issues potentially covered by federal labor law. This decision upholds the existing legal framework regarding labor disputes. Additionally, in a related case, the Supreme Court declined to review the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Martinez v. High, which requires a stringent standard for establishing 'clearly established law' in qualified immunity cases. Meanwhile, a U.S. appeals court panel expressed hesitation regarding a nursing home operator's claim that National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) administrative judges are constitutionally insulated from removal. The Second Circuit also appeared skeptical of the nursing home's arguments that constitutional concerns should block an NLRB case against it. As these cases unfold, the legal landscape surrounding labor law and qualified immunity continues to evolve.