Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
The Supreme Court has protected a woman, along with her 18-year-old son and husband, accused in a drugs case from arrest, despite the Bombay High Court finding no case for anticipatory bail. Additionally, the Supreme Court has been involved in several other cases, including Parveen Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No(s). 1014-1015 of 2013], Tarina Sen Vs. Union of India [SLP (Criminal) No. 1415 of 2024], K. Bharthi Devi Vs. State of Telangana [SLP (Criminal) No. 4353 of 2018], Khalsa University Vs. State of Punjab [SLP(C) No. 33094 of 2017], and Rama Devi Vs. State of Bihar [Criminal Appeal Nos. 2623-2631 of 2014].
03/10/24 - Rama Devi Vs. State of Bihar [Criminal Appeal Nos. 2623-2631 of 2014]: https://t.co/GtYfPX9zMH #Criminal #Appeal #SupremeCourt
03/10/24 - Khalsa University Vs. State of Punjab [Civil Appeal No.________ of 2024 arising out of SLP(C) No. 33094 of 2017]: https://t.co/ZwBKr0AGXo #Civil #Appeal #SupremeCourt
03/10/24 - K. Bharthi Devi Vs. State of Telangana [Criminal Appeal No.________ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 4353 of 2018]: https://t.co/KnnG5YVWgq #Criminal #Appeal #SupremeCourt
