



The House Financial Services Committee, chaired by Patrick McHenry, convened a hearing titled 'Beyond Scope: How the SEC’s Climate Rule Threatens American Markets,' focusing on the criticisms against the SEC's climate disclosure rule. Critics, including committee Republicans and Chairman McHenry, argue the rule oversteps the SEC's authority, imposes unnecessary burdens on producers, and threatens the competitiveness of American markets, potentially having catastrophic effects on job creation and capital market competitiveness. Supporters, including Rep. Al Green and Rep. Juan Vargas, argue the rule is crucial for transparency in climate-related financial risks, highlighting the potential costs of climate change to the economy, estimated at $178 TRILLION over the next half-century, and the importance of investor access to such information, with companies already spending $500,000 a year on average to evaluate these risks. The SEC has stayed the rule's implementation pending litigation, indicating the controversy and legal challenges it faces.
The SEC’s climate disclosure rule is a landmark step that protects investors and workers saving for retirement by ensuring companies are transparent about climate-related risks. Proud to stand with @RepCasten & @RepJuanVargas to defend the rule & it’s protections for consumers. https://t.co/lo9TlgzXMx
It's time for the U.S. to give investors what they want: robust climate disclosure. Congress shouldn't ban ESG when Americans are demanding more transparency about the firms they're investing in. Watch my remarks at the @FinancialCmte's hearing ⬇️ https://t.co/fBonnRtzPC
Yesterday, I addressed @STA_National, discussing the current @SECGov landscape and challenging rules like the Climate Rule and Volume-Tiered Pricing Prohibition. @Nasdaq's Chuck Mack and I dove into how these regulations impact capital access for my constituents, Pennsylvanians,… https://t.co/qu5cZLsTra