
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has voluntarily stayed its climate disclosure rule amid legal challenges and pending litigation, sparking significant backlash. Critics, including political figures and committees, accuse the SEC and Chair @GaryGensler of overstepping its jurisdiction by enforcing climate policy through financial regulation, a move seen as regulatory overreach. The controversy highlights accusations of the SEC ignoring its three-part statutory mission, with the rule described as 'fatally flawed'. The debate centers around the SEC's role, with opponents arguing it should not include climate policy as per #securitiesexchange, #climatedisclosure, and #environmentallaw discussions led by figures like @RepAndyBarr and noted by @MiriamRoure.
The SEC Stays Its Own Climate Rule—What’s Next? https://t.co/q0KZtmxMbf
It's unclear what direction or justification would prompt a securities regulator to pursue climate policy—it certainly wasn't Congress. Make no mistake: the @SECGov's climate rule entirely ignores Congressional intent, cost benefit analysis, and the agency's stated mission. https://t.co/obsmO0nEQ7
From the outset, SEC Chair @GaryGensler has damaged the agency's reputation with a track record of regulatory overreach. The @SECGov has a clear tri-part mission—one that doesn't include climate policy. Chair Gensler must refocus on the Commission's statutory role. https://t.co/d7ry3O75xF






