A Stanford climate scientist was awarded $500,000 in legal fees after winning a lawsuit against another scientist and a journal over a critical academic article. The case, involving defamation, has exhausted appeals. The next legal battle involves National Review vs. Mann for $1M. The issue highlights the political weaponization and profitability of defamation lawsuits in the academic and scientific community.
Sometimes I wonder what should be done about provably false claims on here. Some people punch back or dogpile those involved, but I don't really like that. That said, legal threats seem like a lot. But there is just genuinely a lot of libel that goes on and it is costly.
I'm not big on libel suits... But damn if this may not come close. https://t.co/DjpkuIPLN9
…and this is what happens when defamation lawsuits get politically weaponized and super-lucrative https://t.co/JTaCEqE7AQ