OpenAI’s Rebuttal Of Musk Says He Sued After Company Made ‘Meaningful Progress…Without Him’ https://t.co/QdT6Y1WmGY https://t.co/ozo0uaUf5c
OpenAI investor Vinod Khosla slammed Elon Musk on X/Twitter for suing OpenAI: 'feels like a bit of sour grapes.' Even fellow VC Marc Andreessen jumped into the fray. https://t.co/6wKfGGh20n
OpenAI’s reply to @ElonMusk may turn out to be one of the biggest own-goals of all time, because (as explained below) it inadvertently revealed that they have been lying from the jump. It may also put them in legal jeopardy over their 501(3)(c) non-profit filings. Huge… https://t.co/QyNWKl7YK2 https://t.co/SaG179Yn9E








Indian-American billionaire businessman Vinod Khosla criticized Elon Musk's decision to sue OpenAI, referring to it as 'a case of sour grapes'. This sentiment was echoed in various reports, with Khosla taking to X/Twitter to express his views, which were supported by fellow venture capitalist Marc Andreessen. In response to Musk's lawsuit, the OpenAI team, led by Sam and co, presented evidence of Musk's involvement with the organization. Additionally, an email from 2016 was highlighted, where the meaning of 'open' in OpenAI was explained to Musk. Amidst this controversy, OpenAI issued a rebuttal stating that Musk decided to sue after the company made 'meaningful progress without him'. Gary Marcus pointed out that OpenAI's reply might expose them to legal jeopardy concerning their 501(3)(c) non-profit filings.