
Microsoft has responded to a lawsuit filed by The New York Times by asserting that 'No News Organization Has A Monopoly', amidst a broader discussion on the implications of copyright lawsuits for generative AI. Legal experts and commentators, including Ben Sobel, are divided on the significance of these lawsuits for the future of AI, with some emphasizing the potential legal vulnerabilities of generative AI models. The New York Times has initiated a copyright lawsuit against OpenAI, which has sparked considerable debate within the AI community. Articles and essays have been published, arguing both the potential for these lawsuits to reshape copyright law positively and the serious attention the AI community must give to copyright issues.
Why the @nytimes might win its copyright lawsuit against @OpenAI – The AI community needs to take copyright lawsuits seriously. – Excellent post by @binarybits and @grimmelm https://t.co/f6j7vrSrgc
Don’t give AI free access to work denied to humans, argues Ben Sobel in a guest essay. The legal scholar thinks lawsuits from rights-holders could reshape copyright law for the better https://t.co/j8vDaPZd5Q
I've been surprised by how much disagreement there is on how important (or not) the current copyright lawsuits are for the future of generative AI. Highly recommend this article for understanding more about the law & the various copyright arguments https://t.co/c1r6G7aD2E




