*STATE DEPARTMENT FIRINGS LIKELY VIOLATE INJUNCTION, JUDGE SAYS *JUDGE’S COMMENTS COME IN CASE THAT FROZE TRUMP’S MASS LAYOFFS
4th Circuit gives immigration judges chance to bypass administrative process in challenge to comments policy. https://t.co/dNxzrpgMUs #immigrationlaw #administrativelaw
The Fourth Circuit sent a free speech suit brought by immigration judges back to district court, reasoning a lower court judge must first determine if a law is working as intended with respect to claims that might otherwise be handled administratively. https://t.co/2gP4S2Nh4k
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has directed a federal district court to reassess its jurisdiction over administrative claims filed by an immigration judge association. The appellate court sent a free speech lawsuit brought by immigration judges back to the district court, emphasizing that the lower court must first determine whether the relevant law is functioning as intended, particularly in relation to claims that might otherwise be addressed through administrative procedures. This decision provides immigration judges an opportunity to bypass the administrative process in challenging a comments policy. Separately, a judge overseeing a case that halted former President Donald Trump's mass firings at the State Department indicated that the firings likely violate an injunction, underscoring ongoing judicial scrutiny of the administration's personnel actions.