Three anonymous law students have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), challenging the agency's authority and its ongoing investigation into diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) hiring practices at 20 major law firms. The students argue that Andrea Lucas, the acting chair of the EEOC, lacks the legal authority to request detailed employee information from these firms. The lawsuit contends that the EEOC is being unlawfully weaponized against Big Law and future attorneys. Meanwhile, some top law firms have responded to the federal scrutiny by modifying or reducing their DEI commitments, with Reed Smith notably discontinuing its DEI programs to avoid further EEOC investigation. The deadline for these firms to respond to the EEOC's requests was recently reached, but neither the firms nor the EEOC have confirmed the nature of their responses. Separately, the Equal Protection Project has filed lawsuits alleging racial discrimination through minority scholarship programs at Westfield State University and the University of South Carolina. Additionally, a conservative group has sued the American Bar Association over its Legal Opportunity Scholarship Fund program. These developments highlight ongoing tensions surrounding DEI initiatives and federal oversight within the legal education and Big Law sectors.
Opinion - Big Law’s DEI Crossroads: Resistance, Compromise, and the Trickle-Down Effect https://t.co/SdQUYXFWhH #LawOffice #Rights #Opinion @emmanuelfelton https://t.co/SifYT6WIeR
University of South Carolina Racially Discriminates Through Minority Scholarships, @ProtectionEqual Alleges https://t.co/UZStnnfWmN via @BreitbartNews
Six Discriminatory Scholarships at Westfield State U (MA) Challenged by Equal Protection Project https://t.co/rYdWOw6yRG via .@wajacobson