Quick thread. There's a fascinating -- and very rare! -- discussion of the APA's rule of prejudicial error in the Supreme Court's decision this morning in the vaping case. The Court flags articles from my colleague @chris_j_walker and from me to try to make sense of it! /1 https://t.co/glUZZCJKZG
My @UMichLaw colleague @nicholas_bagley and I have been debating administrative law remedies for nearly a decade now. Fun to see this spill into the latest #SCOTUS decision. (I'm still right about this stuff, FWIW.) 🤓 https://t.co/cr1YoDdFqe https://t.co/ENU3D1MN74
Quick thread on SCOTUS vaping decision. Blog post to follow later. https://t.co/WVpXNumubE
The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously reversed a decision by the Fifth Circuit in the Wages & White Lion vaping case, as reported by legal experts. Justice Samuel Alito authored the opinion, which criticized the Fifth Circuit's interpretation of precedent and directed them to reconsider the case. This decision marks a notable moment in administrative law, highlighting discussions around the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and its implications for legal standards. Legal scholars have noted the decision's significance, particularly in its engagement with the rule of prejudicial error under the APA, a topic that has been debated among legal academics.