The US Supreme Court made it even harder for inmates to challenge their confinement. https://t.co/KK58p4Txu0
Writing for an 8-1 majority, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that an inmate attempting to challenge his segregated confinement in a federal prison in West Virginia should not have seen his case dismissed over the timing of his notice of appeal. https://t.co/74drXq9bHA
In @NRO, @baseballcrank explains why it's unlawful to “discriminate against Catholics merely because the Catholic faith doesn’t treat charity and proselytization the same way that other denominations do.” More about Catholic Charities' 9-0 SCOTUS win👇https://t.co/fBaclSgq6h
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8–1 that a notice of appeal filed after a final judgment but before a case is reopened may serve as the operative filing once proceedings resume, eliminating the need for a second notice. The decision in Martin v. United States relaxes a technical deadline that has tripped up many self-represented litigants. Writing for the majority, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said lower courts improperly dismissed a West Virginia federal inmate’s suit challenging his segregated confinement over timing issues. The Institute for Justice, which represented the prisoner pro bono, hailed the ruling as a significant win for prisoners and other litigants who handle their own cases. Justice Neil Gorsuch dissented. In a separate opinion issued the same day, the Court prohibited prisoners from adding new claims to habeas corpus petitions after a final judgment, affirming strict statutory limits on repeat habeas filings.