Serious Supreme Court decision comes down. Did they get this right? https://t.co/57fF2TGdet
May vape companies sell flavors like “Jimmy The Juice Man in Peachy Strawberry?” The Supreme Court said no. Because the vape company didn't prove "flavored vapes had a net public benefit." Why should they have to? Can't government leave us alone? I made a video about that. https://t.co/5M5DXVasoP
Supreme Court Rules Lost Wages May Be Recoverable Under RICO For False Advertising After Drug Test Dismissal https://t.co/qAdMBTB6KD
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a 5-4 decision that individuals can seek damages for business or property losses resulting from personal injury under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). This ruling also impacts a medical marijuana firm that sought to avoid a racketeering lawsuit. The court's decision may lead to complications in RICO personal injury cases, as noted by dissenting opinions. Additionally, the court ruled that lost wages could be recoverable under RICO for false advertising related to drug test dismissals. In a separate case, the Supreme Court denied a vape company's request to sell flavored products, stating that the company failed to demonstrate a net public benefit from flavored vapes. This decision could signal a tightening of regulations for e-cigarette manufacturers.