The Supreme Court's foreign aid funding ruling gave court watchers a glimpse of a coalition majority (Roberts, Barrett + liberals) that could end up thwarting some of President Trump's more aggressive and novel attempts to expand executive power. #SCOTUS https://t.co/uX5grYaOLT
Opinion | Supreme Court's USAID move has a surprise benefit for Trump https://t.co/kxYyglM6Iw
How Trump’s $2B Court Battle Over Foreign Aid Could Reshape Executive Authority https://t.co/GgDgW9uZBa
The Supreme Court voted 5-4 to reject the Trump administration's request to freeze $2 billion in USAID and State Department funds. This ruling has been interpreted as a reinforcement of the legal order, indicating that the Trump administration cannot bypass existing laws. Legal experts suggest that while this decision is a victory for USAID, it may not be a definitive win for the Trump administration, as it reflects ongoing tensions regarding executive authority. In a related development, a federal judge denied New York City's request to reclaim over $80 million in federal reimbursement funds intended for migrant shelter and services, ruling that the city failed to demonstrate irreparable harm without the funds. This decision further complicates the financial landscape for New York City amid ongoing challenges with federal funding for migrant services.