Kenyan President William Ruto has introduced a new government framework aimed at compensating civilians and security personnel who were injured or lost their lives during protests and public demonstrations since 2017. The framework has sparked debate among political leaders, with figures like Kalonzo Musyoka and Moses Wamalwa advocating for the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR) to oversee the compensation process, citing concerns over trust in a presidentially appointed committee. The KNCHR has expressed support for establishing a dedicated compensation committee but emphasizes that justice and accountability must accompany any financial reparations. The commission has also called for a broader approach that includes justice for affected families and accountability for violations. Various experts and advocates have weighed in, highlighting the need for a litigation framework to uphold the right to life and for prosecution of those responsible for abuses during the protests. President Ruto has additionally criticized the Kenyan Parliament, accusing members of corruption and describing it as a "den of graft." The discussions reflect ongoing tensions regarding how best to address the aftermath of protests and ensure both compensation and justice for victims.
Prof. Peter Kagwanja: Parliament has had problems even before President Ruto, but is it the Executive that should throw the first stone or the Legislature? #CitizenDayBreak https://t.co/C4pvJhU5Aj
Nelson Havi – Advocate: The president’s complaint about corruption in Parliament shows he believes it has become a House of brats, and should therefore dissolve it #CitizenDayBreak https://t.co/fajcRZ6ypx
Ahmed Hashi – Governance Expert: The abuse of human rights, and the subsequent attempt to compensate shows clear state culpability. If lives have been lost, those accountable must face prosecution #CitizenDayBreak https://t.co/GD61KE8Jv1