Why SF's response to the Supreme Court decision on homelessness could decide the mayor's race, https://t.co/aIvJaJbmvP @Twolfrecovery @garrytan @TSFAction
PITCH & MOAN: Homeless tents nationwide could be in for rude awakening — pack up and move out. The major implications of a Supreme Court showdown. https://t.co/YlQGokPiLw https://t.co/6CqbKmVkoz
"As the Supreme Court considers 'Grants Pass v. Johnson', policymakers who deal with homelessness should consider two key questions: Are people who are living outside doing so voluntarily or involuntarily? And is shelter available to them?" #PostLetters https://t.co/eYqXCGsU7g
The Supreme Court's ruling on an Oregon city's public sleeping ordinances is anticipated to have a significant impact on homelessness policies nationwide. California leaders are concerned about potential repercussions, while San Francisco is exploring new assistance for unhoused migrant families amidst ongoing legal considerations. The case of Grants Pass could influence homeless policies on a national level, with implications for cities like San Francisco. The debate centers on whether people living outside are doing so voluntarily or involuntarily and the availability of shelter for them.