Recent discussions surrounding Ethereum (ETH) have brought its regulatory status into the spotlight, with various entities including Coinbase's Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, and SEC officials weighing in. The debate focuses on whether ETH should be classified as a security or a commodity. Historical statements from SEC's then-Director of Corporation Finance, William Hinman, in 2018 suggested that ETH did not resemble a security, a sentiment echoed by other SEC officials who saw no need to regulate Ether as such. This stance was supported by Gary Gensler's comments on Ethereum's decentralized nature making it non-security. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has treated ETH as a commodity for years, allowing ether futures contracts. The SEC's acknowledgment of ETH's non-security status was further highlighted when it permitted ETH Futures ETFs to trade on regulated security exchanges, as noted by Brian Quintenz. Coinbase's Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, criticized the SEC for potentially denying ETH Exchange-Traded Product (ETP) applications, arguing that the SEC has no good reason to challenge ETH's established regulatory status.
đ¨JUST IN: SEC HAS "NO GOOD REASON" TO DENY SPOT $ETH ETFS SAYS @COINBASE CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER
Coinbase legal chief argues SEC has âno good reasonâ to deny spot Ethereum ETFs https://t.co/fE1ofjUQv7
Brian Quintenz: âWhen the SEC allowed ETH Futures ETFs to trade on its regulated security exchanges, it explicitly acknowledged the status of the underlying, ETH, as being a non-security and outside of its jurisdictionâ. https://t.co/2rWTADGyUU https://t.co/lkmAQTZYo9