🚨 NEW: The U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is deploying an AI tool to help cut 50% of federal regulations by Jan 2026. The “DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool” analyzes 200k rules, targets 100k for repeal, and claims to save 93% of man-hours (3.6M → 252k). https://t.co/tRACAPSwzT
🤖 El “Doge del Trump” está usando inteligencia artificial para identificar y eliminar normativas federales que considera innecesarias. https://t.co/9AJWiSpo01
DOGE ANNOUNCES PLANS TO LAUNCH AI TOOL TO REDUCE 50% OF U.S. REGULATIONS DOGE announced plans to launch an AI tool aimed at cutting 50% of U.S. regulations by January 2026, potentially saving trillions in compliance costs. Source: @Cointelegraph https://t.co/0hKM8wggZP
The U.S. Department of Government Efficiency, a unit created under President Donald Trump and once headed by Elon Musk, is developing an artificial-intelligence platform to accelerate deregulation, according to internal documents obtained by the Washington Post. The “DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool” has reviewed roughly 200,000 federal regulations and identified about 100,000—half the total—for possible repeal by January 2026, the first anniversary of Trump’s second inauguration. A PowerPoint presentation cited by the newspaper says the system has already been tested at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, where it drafted all proposed deregulations, and at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which used the tool to assess more than 1,000 regulatory sections. DOGE projects that automating the review could cut required staff time by 93%, from 3.6 million to 252,000 labor hours, and supporters inside the agency claim the changes could eventually trim compliance costs by “trillions” of dollars. The White House confirmed that the administration is examining artificial-intelligence options to meet its pledge of the “most aggressive regulatory reduction in history,” but spokesman Harrison Fields told the Post that no plan has yet been formally approved and the effort remains in early stages. The initiative is likely to draw scrutiny from lawmakers and industry groups concerned about the accuracy of AI-driven legal analyses after HUD employees reported that the tool occasionally misinterpreted statutory language.