The ACC's effort to move Clemson-South Carolina to a Friday certainly ruffled some feathers amongst college football traditionalists. But why did this even show up in a legal filing in Pickens County? Here is the context in regards to Clemson v. the ACC. https://t.co/nxVuNxOiOO
Clemson and the ACC's court battle in North Carolina opened with a conference attorney referencing Casablanca and the university's attorneys running through a purple and orange PowerPoint. But no ruling from the judge, as of yet. https://t.co/ASmQ4yJWWz
The ACC wanted Clemson to change the date/time of the South Carolina game to Friday night and Clemson was like “nah”. 😂
The legal battle between Clemson University and the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) continued today at the Mecklenburg County Courthouse in Charlotte. The case management conference focused on Clemson's motions to dismiss and stay the lawsuit filed by the ACC. Clemson Athletic Director Graham Neff and trustee David Dukes were present. Clemson argued that the ACC misconstrued South Carolina law and that Clemson cannot be sued outside its state without consent, invoking sovereign immunity. Judge Bledsoe appeared skeptical of Clemson's argument but committed to ruling on the motions before July 12. This date is significant as it coincides with another hearing scheduled in Pickens County, South Carolina, for the original lawsuit. ACC lawyers highlighted a picture of Clemson President Jim Clements shaking hands with former ACC Commissioner John Swofford, emphasizing Clemson's previous agreements with the ACC. Additionally, Clemson refused a request by the ACC and ESPN to move its home game against South Carolina to the Friday night after Thanksgiving, known as Black Friday.