The Supreme Court, in an 8:1 majority verdict by a nine-judge Constitution bench, has ruled that states have the legislative competence to levy taxes on mines and minerals bearing lands under the Constitution. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, along with seven other justices, concluded that the Parliament does not have the power to tax mineral rights. The court also held that royalty payable on minerals under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, is not a tax but a form of contractual payment. This decision overturns a 1989 verdict by a seven-judge Constitution bench, which had held that royalty on minerals is a tax. The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to make the verdict prospective. This ruling is seen as a setback for miners.
8:1 majority: SC upholds power of states to levy tax on mineral bearing lands Read more🔗https://t.co/o8Bb7om8r4 #SupremeCourt #Tax #Land
The #SupremeCourt has affirmed that states have the authority to levy #taxes on mineral rights and would not be limited by the Mines and #Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 (MMDR Act). @VMukherjee7 https://t.co/YIz4C0wzWC https://t.co/G0H24ASbaL
VIDEO | Here's what Congress MP Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) said on the Supreme Court's judgment that royalty payable on minerals is not a tax and states have the legislative competence to impose taxes on mines and minerals-bearing lands. "The issue here was whether the… https://t.co/UKwxHvn9UA