Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
The Supreme Court is considering framing guidelines for advocates' associations to standardize admission regulations. It rejected a petition for a 3-year law course, emphasizing the need for mature professionals. The Court also dismissed a PIL seeking a committee to explore a shift to a 3-year LLB course, with the CJI suggesting starting law practice after high school.
"Why have a course at all, start law practice after high school," says CJI as SC rejects PIL scrapping 5-year LLB course https://t.co/EUu8Ijbswo
The Supreme Court refused to entertain a PIL seeking directions to the Centre and the BCI to set up an expert committee for exploring the feasibility of introducing a three-year LLB course instead of the existing five-year course. https://t.co/vGXUVMRlyu
Plea seeking 3-year law course: Top Court say no; need mature people in the profession #SupremeCourt https://t.co/ct3EoWlKnK