
California's real estate development process is under scrutiny due to allegations of corruption linked to discretionary approval processes. Critics argue that the system, which requires housing approvals to go through a discretionary process involving city councils, fosters corruption. This system is reportedly maintained with the support of advocacy groups financed by entities like @calfund. The ongoing wave of corruption is attributed to the wide authority granted to politicians and bureaucrats to deny or delay development projects. The New York Times has highlighted these issues, along with a lawsuit involving RealPage, pointing to arbitrary zoning and building laws as key enablers of corruption.
The big NYT story on corruption in California building permission, and the RealPage lawsuit, are both caused by arbitrary zoning and building laws that give people incentive and ability for corruption. What's best research paper on "supply of corruption" in institutional design?
There's one source for the ongoing California corruption wave: discretionary reviews. As long as politicians and bureaucrats have wide authority to deny or slow walk development, the lure of graft will be irresistible. https://t.co/hAU8biyrmt
Los Angeles is lousy with corruption because housing approvals require the blessing of City Council.* LA's corruption-enabling permitting system persists in part because @calfund finances advocacy groups to maintain this system! https://t.co/erX5Z1RJB1
