All pre-2016 college athlete #NIL violation lawsuits have the same potential problem: Statute of Limitations. https://t.co/J9eXDrUbk8
As expected, more lawsuits filed on behalf of athletes who participated before 2016 (the stretch that the House case does not cover). https://t.co/NzMivqXviA
We have yet another lawsuit by a pre-2016 college athlete for Nil violations. This time: Terrelle Pryor has sued the NCAA, Ohio State, the Big Ten, and Learfield. As with the others, it's based on antitrust and unjust enrichment. Complaint: https://t.co/1SGdvbyx1w https://t.co/XzUlSOvY3s
Late last night, a brief was filed by a new group of House settlement objectors, represented by Hausfeld LLP, challenging the amended NCAA antitrust settlement. Hausfeld LLP, known for representing Ed O'Bannon in the landmark O'Bannon v. NCAA case, is now representing three current college athletes, two former college athletes, and two current high school athletes, along with a parent who is also a former college athlete. The challenge focuses on the revenue-sharing system and NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) restrictions. Additionally, more lawsuits have been filed on behalf of athletes who participated before 2016, including a case by Terrelle Pryor against the NCAA, Ohio State, the Big Ten, and Learfield, based on antitrust and unjust enrichment claims. However, these pre-2016 lawsuits face potential issues with the Statute of Limitations.