The U.S. Supreme Court has recently denied certiorari in several significant cases, impacting both legal and ethical discussions. Notably, the Court declined to hear Carey Dale Grayson v. Hamm, an Eighth Amendment case, which has raised concerns within legal circles. Additionally, the Court rejected the case of Vicki Baker v. McKinney, where a Texas woman sought compensation for damages incurred during a police raid by a SWAT team. The ruling stems from a Fifth Circuit decision stating that police actions deemed 'objectively necessary' do not require compensation for property damage. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, alongside Justice Neil Gorsuch, issued a statement underscoring the complexity of the issue, despite not dissenting. Furthermore, the Court also declined to hear U.S. v. Hay, which involved the legality of warrantless surveillance using pole cameras directed at a suspect's home. These decisions reflect the Court's current stance on Fourth and Fifth Amendment issues, raising questions about the balance between law enforcement actions and property rights.
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Case on Compensation for Home Damaged in Police Raid The U.S. Supreme Court has decided not to hear the case of a Texas woman, Vicki Baker, who sought compensation for damages caused by a SWAT team raid on her home in pursuit of an armed fugitive.…
Today #SCOTUS denied cert in the @IJ case Baker v. McKinney. In the SWAT #takings case, we argue destructive raids are 5A takings and require compensation. Though cert was denied, Sotomayor & Gorsuch wrote separately to confirm the importance of the issue: https://t.co/2TU5BVB1Wu https://t.co/o0FpWWCNm0 https://t.co/fKrcadZog9
Supreme Court denies cert in 5th Cir. ruling refusing to compensate homeowner when house is destroyed by cops if police action was "objectively necessary." Sotomayor w/ Gorsuch issues opinion. https://t.co/PMkVkB0g2Z