On January 14, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two significant cases: Thompson v. United States and Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services. In Thompson v. U.S., the Court considered whether a law prohibiting false statements to financial institutions applies to statements that are misleading but not outright false. This case involves former Chicago Alderman Patrick Daley Thompson, who was convicted of lying to bank regulators. Meanwhile, Waetzig v. Halliburton addresses whether federal courts can reopen cases voluntarily dismissed by plaintiffs, specifically focusing on a former Halliburton employee's age discrimination claim. The outcomes of these cases could have implications for how false and misleading statements are interpreted in financial contexts and the authority of courts regarding dismissed cases.
As the U.S. Supreme Court analyzed judicial powers to reopen dismissed cases, a Halliburton attorney sought to steer oral arguments toward questions the high court hadn't agreed to address, testing some justices' patience. https://t.co/pHGLFSsuS3 https://t.co/0BjQvKUvFR
The Supreme Court signaled that it will rule for a former Halliburton employee seeking to revive his age discrimination complaint against the energy giant. https://t.co/9xQy3wnVwg
“Cookies, Cocktails and Mushrooms on the Menu as Justices Hear Bank Fraud Case; In trying to find the line between false statements and misleading ones in the case of a Chicago politician, members of the Supreme Court posed colorful questions”: Adam Liptak https://t.co/XpqLrqoQ4I