Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
LAW DORK: Protecting the rule of law under Trump is going to be precarious. The justices must decide, in the wake of last term's decisions, whether they will play any role in that aim. And, for paid subscribers: Closing my tabs. https://t.co/wOjcj4oT38
In today’s @nytimes (gift link), me on how we will likely need #SCOTUS to stand up to a second-term President Trump—and how the justices’ own behavior over the last four years will make it more difficult for them to do so even if they wanted to: https://t.co/e6oNvkeXgO
On Sunday, I took a look at the rule of law — and the difficult path ahead given the incoming Trump administration, the current Supreme Court, and more. https://t.co/iP4jB13VuV
As the Supreme Court prepares for a new term, significant discussions are emerging regarding the justices' role in upholding the rule of law under a potential second-term Trump administration. Legal analysts emphasize the precarious nature of this task, particularly in light of the justices' past decisions and the challenges they may face in maintaining judicial integrity. The upcoming decisions will be crucial in determining whether the Court will act as a check on executive power, especially given the contentious political landscape. Observers note that the implications of the Court's actions could have lasting effects on the legal framework surrounding governance and accountability in the United States.
