Supreme Court Ruling on Arizona Voting Rights, Citizenship Requirement Affects 41,000 Voters
On August 23, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant ruling regarding voting rights in Arizona, rejecting a Republican effort that could have prevented over 41,000 Arizona voters from participating in the presidential election. This divided Supreme Court decision has sparked discussions about voter integrity, with some celebrating the requirement for citizenship to vote in Arizona. Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody praised the decision, emphasizing the importance of ensuring only citizens can vote. The decision is seen as a victory for democracy by some, including Vivek Ramaswamy, who advocates for clear distinctions between citizen and non-citizen voting rights.
Sources
Royce White 🇺🇸
In what world are illegal immigrants or non-citizens voting a split issue? This is all you need to know to show we’re living through a usurpation of American citizenship! What’s next? If you don’t have to be a citizen to vote are you even a citizen anymore? Is this a country? https://t.co/2zhNzSpvJK
Capitol Media Services 📢 Telling it like it isICYMI: Supreme Court OKs vote on plan to give judges de facto life terms - and in a way to override any decision by voters to turn Bolick and King out of office in general election. https://t.co/pIvqjCnmdj https://t.co/4xk2eOaq9m
Laura Ingraham Vivek Ramaswamy: The Supreme Court’s ruling on Arizona voter integrity is a win for democracy. Citizens should vote, and non-citizens shouldn’t—it's that simple. #VoterIntegrity https://t.co/kvTchs6Sta
Additional media
