In a recent Supreme Court case concerning universal injunctions, Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored a majority opinion that has drawn considerable attention for its sharp critique and legal reasoning. Barrett's opinion, which addressed the authority of trial judges to issue universal injunctions, was noted for its incisiveness and has been compared to the style of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. The case, Trump v. CASA, involved questions about the scope of judicial power in issuing such injunctions. Barrett's analysis was described as highly persuasive by legal commentators, including Orin Kerr, who had previously expressed skepticism about the practice during the Biden administration. The opinion was seen as a strong rebuke to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's position, with several commentators characterizing Barrett's argument as a decisive and dominant legal challenge to Jackson's views.