Trump UN envoy pick chastised for discussing bombing on Signal https://t.co/qE9SnWm61l
In congressional testimony, President Trump’s former national security adviser said his use of Signal to coordinate military operations was “driven by” cybersecurity guidance from CISA. https://t.co/ptOmR8BckB | https://t.co/IPeaM526te
Mishandling classified info puts U.S. troops at risk. If a private soldier had acted in the same reckless way as the Defense Secretary, they’d be fired. Where is the accountability, @SecDef? https://t.co/BzRZs2HwLe
Mike Waltz, former national security adviser under President Donald Trump, defended his use of the encrypted messaging app Signal to coordinate military operations during a congressional hearing. Waltz stated that the use of Signal was recommended, and nearly mandated, by the Biden-era Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) guidance. However, his defense faced strong criticism from Democratic lawmakers who argued that the leaks of military information on Signal could have endangered servicemembers' lives. Senators expressed frustration over Waltz's lack of regret and the absence of accountability following the incident, which has been referred to as "Signalgate." Additionally, Waltz was questioned about his substantial salary despite the perceived failure related to the Signal chat leak. The controversy also extended to Trump's nominee for UN envoy, who was criticized for discussing sensitive military actions on Signal. The debate highlights ongoing concerns about the handling of classified information and cybersecurity protocols within the U.S. defense establishment.