Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
Courts Just Say No to Trump’s Authoritarian Power Grabs https://t.co/wUZspBh6RQ
With its USAID ruling the Supreme Court's majority said the Trump administration can’t end-run the existing legal order to do whatever it wants. That’s the message we need now, @NoahRFeldman says https://t.co/upqd87gc5i via @opinion
“Supreme Court’s USAID Ruling Sends an Important Message; The court sides with the rule of law and hands President Trump a big defeat in one of their first confrontations”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg Opinion. At his “One https://t.co/JvMQ8VK1Mn
On March 6, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled against former President Donald Trump regarding USAID payments, marking a notable defeat for his administration. The ruling emphasized that the Trump administration cannot bypass existing legal frameworks to implement its policies. Legal experts, including a fellow from the Heritage Foundation, noted that while this ruling is significant, it may not be the final resolution on the matter. Commentators have pointed out that the decision sends a clear message about adherence to the rule of law, with some cautioning that the implications of the ruling may be more complex than they appear. The ruling is seen as a victory for the judiciary in its role to check executive power, as articulated by various legal analysts.
