DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
The U.S. Supreme Court has faced criticism for the length of time taken to rule on cases involving January 6 defendants compared to those involving members of the Tren de Aragua criminal gang. The Court took over 30,000 hours, or approximately 1,250 days, to provide relief to January 6 defendants, who were charged under a rarely used statute that elevated misdemeanor trespass to a felony. In contrast, the Supreme Court ruled on a habeas petition related to Tren de Aragua foreign terrorists within about 24 hours, during a 14-hour period on Holy Saturday. The Court's decision on the Tren de Aragua case was to remand it back to a lower court. This disparity in timing has prompted questions about the Court's priorities and its handling of cases involving illegal immigrant criminal gang members versus domestic defendants.
RT @mrddmia From first arrest to its ruling, it took the Supreme Court over 30,000 hours to provide relief to January 6th defendants persecuted by Biden. From habeas petition to its ruling, it took the Supreme Court only about 24 hours to provide relief to Tren de Aragua
🚨 SCOTUS SCANDAL: Biden's DOJ politically persecuted J6ers for YEARS, with the Supreme Court taking over 30,000 hours—1,250 DAYS—to grant relief. Yet Tren de Aragua ALIEN TERRORISTS get a ruling in just 24 hours! Why does SCOTUS give illegal alien thugs priority over https://t.co/TphZjUXUOs
From first arrest to its ruling, it took the Supreme Court over 30,000 hours to provide relief to January 6th defendants persecuted by Biden. From habeas petition to its ruling, it took the Supreme Court only about 24 hours to provide relief to Tren de Aragua foreign terrorists.
