The Supreme Court is considering a case related to broadband that may revive a long-dormant separation of powers principle, potentially shifting regulatory authority away from agencies. A majority of the justices appear receptive to this idea, which could have widespread implications across various industries. Recently, the Sixth Circuit ruled that net neutrality is unlawful, a decision that aligns with the end of Chevron deference, a legal doctrine that has traditionally allowed agencies to interpret regulations. This ruling concludes a decade-long regulatory debate over net neutrality. Commentary from judicial figures suggests that the end of Chevron has stabilized legal interpretations and calls for Congressional action to legislate on these issues.