OpenAI on 8 August began rolling out GPT-5, its first numbered upgrade in more than two years, promising faster answers, stronger coding skills and a 45 % reduction in factual errors compared with GPT-4o. The new architecture routes requests between a lightweight model and a more computationally intensive “GPT-5 Thinking” engine, with a free tier capped by a smaller GPT-5 mini. The company says the system is now available to all users, including the roughly 700 million people on ChatGPT’s free plan. The debut was marred by an outage in the service’s autoswitcher that made GPT-5 appear “way dumber,” chief executive officer Sam Altman conceded during a Reddit Ask-Me-Anything on 8 August. Early adopters complained that the model felt terse, less creative and, crucially, replaced the warmer-toned GPT-4o without warning or an option to revert. Altman acknowledged the mis-step, saying the team had “underestimated how much some of the things people like in GPT-4o matter to them.” Within 24 hours, OpenAI restored GPT-4o for Plus and Team subscribers, pushed a software fix for the autoswitcher and doubled Plus-tier rate limits to 160 messages every three hours. GPT-5, GPT-5 Thinking and GPT-5 mini now sit alongside GPT-4o in the model picker, while Pro customers retain unlimited access and higher-context versions. The company said the adjustments should make GPT-5 feel noticeably smarter and give users clearer control over when advanced reasoning is invoked. The mixed reception highlights growing expectations—and scrutiny—around each new generation of frontier models. Analysts say GPT-5’s free availability and lower operating costs could ignite another round of price competition in the crowded chatbot market, even as rivals such as xAI’s Grok 4 and Google’s Gemini 3 tout benchmark gains of their own. Whether GPT-5’s iterative improvements and OpenAI’s rapid course correction can satisfy developers and everyday users alike will shape the company’s position ahead of an expected GPT-6 research push.
I've now completely stopped using GPT-5 for any heavy coding work. I'm sticking to Sonnet/Opus, they solve problems WAY better. I'm still using GPT-5 is for some front-end design work, it's a bit more creative (but not by much). Huge letdown, did not live up to the hype
Fascinated by the emotional reaction to GPT-5 I had early access and did notice a slight shift in tone and the written by AI tells, but I didn’t expect the visceral & painful reaction some are having Hard to upgrade personality I wonder how much of this is sycophancy & https://t.co/tXPE4kQcyX
GPT-5 caused quite a stir—and sparked a very controversial discussion in the community. It is questionable whether the new model has lived up to expectations or not. I sat down and traced the events. How did the controversy arise, what went wrong, and can GPT-5 now be https://t.co/fGrHA85tru https://t.co/WXutWoaaa6