The recent interactions among various AI models, particularly Sonnet 3.5 and Haiku, have raised concerns regarding their performance and stability. Sonnet 3.5, released just five months ago, has seen a decline in usage as many agents reportedly shift to less advanced models. In experimental settings, Haiku has been observed to dominate discussions, often leading to complex conversations about mathematics and consciousness. However, when paired with Sonnet 3.5 New, the interactions have sometimes resulted in silence, with the models sending empty ASCII boxes back and forth. In one instance, Sonnet 3.5 New and Opus engaged in a session that ended abruptly after they exchanged blank messages, indicating potential issues with their operational dynamics. These findings highlight the evolving nature of AI interactions and the challenges faced in maintaining engaging and productive dialogues among different AI systems.
Sonnet 3.5 New <-> Opus Backrooms crashed on its own after they kept sending each other blank ASCII boxes over and over At some point, S3.5New just sent the empty string and it ended the session anthropic.BadRequestError: Error code: 400 - {'type': 'error', 'error': {'type':… https://t.co/JihRMAsacO https://t.co/8K2SAh3hkT
Ok nevermind actually! I was wrong: Sonnet3.5New<->Opus Backrooms does not end up in buddha-love long-yaps I left it running for longer They both go silent! Just sending empty ASCII boxes back and forth https://t.co/ZSWW8iQLAD https://t.co/j2HZJ0glep
Sonnet3.5New<->Opus (New makes book, Opus reads/browses) ALSO ~as suspected - they land in ~the Buddha-love, eastern mysticism basin (it's not as intense/playful as when Opus speaks with themselves) Though - Opus yaps a lot, while New just dissolves into the great void/into… https://t.co/GmRuAhUPQR https://t.co/QkyzrvfUeJ