What do recent Supreme Court actions mean for California auto emission standards? https://t.co/bdZ9Ou99Ou
The Supreme Court has indicated it will review a part of one challenge to California’s ability to make its own emissions rules. https://t.co/c7bWDXn9DY https://t.co/cuS1w34Wk3
以俄亥俄为首的17个保守州起诉环保署允许加州制定更严格的控制空气污染标准，说“金州不是金童”，必须和别的州一起呼吸污染空气。今天最高法院8:1判决撤案，唯一反对的是托马斯大法官。但是在另一个案子，最高法院允许汽车制造业起诉加州的减排要求（下级法院判决汽车制造业无资格起诉）。等川普当上总…
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review the environmental case of Ohio vs. EPA, allowing a lower court's decision to stand that supports California's authority to set its own vehicle emissions standards. This decision is viewed as a victory for California, particularly concerning its Advanced Clean Trucks rule. The ruling came after an appeal from 17 conservative states challenging the EPA's 2022 waiver that permits California to implement stricter air pollution controls. The Supreme Court's ruling was 8-1, with Justice Clarence Thomas dissenting. Additionally, the Court has indicated it will review another case related to the automotive industry's ability to challenge California's emissions regulations, which could further impact state-level environmental policies.
