Sources
Loading...
Additional media
Loading...
DeepNewz, mobile.
People-sourced. AI-powered. Unbiased News.
As President Donald Trump continues to assert expansive executive authority, the U.S. Supreme Court appears to be navigating a delicate balance between supporting and checking his power. Analysts note that the Court is currently avoiding direct confrontation with the White House while exercising its right of judicial review. Chief Justice John Roberts's perspective suggests that the executive branch may prevail in disputes over authority. Columnists have commented on the implications of Trump's approach, indicating that he may be willing to challenge the Supreme Court, particularly in cases like Abrego Garcia, which could set a significant precedent for his presidency. The conservative majority in the Court is also being scrutinized for how it may respond to Trump's regulatory changes and whether it will yield to his extraordinary exertions of power.
On a new episode of #NewYorkerRadio, the former Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus discusses where the Supreme Court—with its conservative majority—may yield to Trump’s extraordinary exertions of power, and where it may attempt to check his authority. https://t.co/tWPrTeURAN
Many people are, in my view naïvely, claiming that Trump would not choose to take on the Supreme Court in the Abrego Garcia case because it’s a loser for him. I think he may see this as a chance to establish possibly the most important principle of his entire presidency. 1/
“Trump’s Triple-Dog Supreme Court Dare; Will the justices be comfortable with the president’s wholesale regulatory changes?” Columnist Kimberley A. Strassel has this op-ed in today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal. https://t.co/wGI0wbWyJH
