
The U.S. Supreme Court's recent decisions during the 2023-2024 term have raised concerns regarding the authority of federal agencies to enact health policies and interpret laws. Legal experts, including Lee Fleisher, A. Joseph O'Connell, and Michelle M. Mello, have discussed the implications of these rulings, suggesting that while the situation is not dire, it presents challenges for agency authority. Notably, the Court's ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy has significant consequences for the Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG) powers. Additionally, the Supreme Court's decision to limit federal agencies' interpretative powers is expected to impact U.S. climate and environmental policies, as highlighted by Alice C. Hill.
The Supreme Court’s recent ruling that limits federal agencies’ power to interpret laws will have major implications for U.S. climate and environmental policies, writes @Alice_C_Hill. https://t.co/5DsBstaODB
The Effect of Supreme Court Decision in SEC v. Jarkesy on HHS-OIG Powers https://t.co/knYuqmpbXr #Securities #Health #Litigation @BTLawNews https://t.co/xqfW6zlIeh
My take on SCOTUS' incursions into agency authority, with @AJosephOConnell & Lee Fleisher: The sky isn't falling--but it's a lot more cloudy. @StanfordHP @StanfordLaw https://t.co/HTtT535uhS

