Donald Trump’s pick to head the Bureau of Labor Statistics lacks the qualifications of his predecessor, @brianklaas argues. But what he “lacks in credentials and expertise he makes up for in his MAGA worldview”: https://t.co/boGNqBS6gX
BLS Commissioner is a role that has never gone to an ideologue. It’s been for data nerds who care only about numbers. Put in someone with a record of distorting data, and every figure becomes tainted. https://t.co/5oGXONdWIb
If you appoint an ideologue to a role built for number nerds, the damage isn’t just bad policy—it’s public doubt in every statistic we publish. That’s how you undermine understanding.
President Donald Trump's decision to fire the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner and nominate E.J. Antoni as his replacement has sparked controversy and concern among economists and policymakers. Antoni, who has described Social Security as a "Ponzi scheme," faces a challenging Senate confirmation process. Critics argue that Antoni lacks the qualifications and expertise of his predecessor and is ideologically driven, raising fears that his appointment could undermine public trust in the accuracy and impartiality of BLS data. Former BLS Associate Commissioner Michael Horrigan defended the bureau, stating that its data collection and reporting processes are governed by established templates and bureaucracy, making political manipulation unlikely. However, some economists warn that appointing an ideologue to a role traditionally held by data-focused experts could damage the credibility of economic statistics and unsettle important inflation hedges. The situation has drawn attention beyond monetary policy, with JPMorgan highlighting potential wider economic implications.