"The risk from this nonruling is that executive vs. judicial friction will escalate without firm direction from the Supreme Court," @jawillick writes. https://t.co/dxHj7AsAIt
Trump tells Supreme Court the reinstatement of a fired officer for even a day causes imminent harm. Supreme Court: Well, it's only until Wednesday, so we don't see it a big enough infringement on the Executive Branch to interfere. Fired Officer: https://t.co/j3MyPg14GM
“Trump Is the Law for the Executive Branch; How the administration conforms legal interpretation to the president’s wishes”: Jack Goldsmith has this post at the “Executive Functions” Substack site. https://t.co/WBUF96dWqE
The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump from dismissing the director of the Office of Special Counsel, following a lower court's injunction that reinstated the official. The Court declined to immediately weigh in on the validity of this order, which asserts that Trump lacks the authority to remove the official without cause. Legal analysts note that this marks a rare instance where a court has intervened to prevent a president from firing a government official. The situation raises concerns about the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches, with potential implications for the authority of independent federal agencies. The Supreme Court's decision not to act on the government's emergency appeal leaves the Special Counsel in place, continuing to exercise executive power contrary to the President's wishes, at least until a further ruling is made.