President Trump will just ignore any activists judges and their erroneous decisions. There is nothing these Twatwaffles can do about it. Some cases will end up at SCOTUS anyway and that’s where the Trump Administration wants them anyway. https://t.co/MpCc6O9lAy
I do not want the country to be in a situation where the President ignores Federal Court orders. That is what these activist judges are forcing us into. They are making stuff up to try to "get Trump," and stop him from governing. This cannot stand. https://t.co/TdpONk9xxh
The Supreme Court must step in quickly and decisively on the emergency docket, as activist judges are illegally sabotaging the Article II power of the President. Otherwise, the judiciary will lose its legitimacy—then its funding. (Do your jobs without law clerks, for example.) https://t.co/7xp3rMSEbe
In recent discussions, supporters of President Donald Trump have emphasized the need for the Supreme Court to intervene against what they describe as judicial activism that obstructs his executive authority. They argue that left-wing judges are impeding Trump's reforms and that the President should seek ways to fast-track his policies through the courts. Commentary has pointed to the necessity for Trump to appoint judges who align with his administration's goals to counteract perceived micromanagement from the judiciary and legislature. There are calls for the Supreme Court to act decisively to maintain its legitimacy and to protect the President's Article II powers. Some supporters suggest that Trump may need to disregard decisions made by activist judges, asserting that cases will ultimately reach the Supreme Court where they believe favorable outcomes can be achieved.