The Trump administration has escalated its legal confrontations by appealing to the Supreme Court to lift a 14-day block on mass firings of federal workers across nearly two dozen agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The Department of Justice (DOJ) is seeking to proceed with these Reduction in Force (RIFs) actions. In a separate but equally significant case, the Supreme Court is considering the legality of President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship. The order challenges the 14th Amendment's guarantee of citizenship for all persons born in the U.S., except for children of diplomats and soldiers of invading armies, by claiming it was never intended to apply to children of undocumented immigrants and temporary visa-holders. These cases before the Supreme Court could directly impact the legal status of thousands of children born on American soil and influence the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches.
Will the Supreme Court pick practicality over principle? 🏛️🤔 The justices just heard arguments on whether federal courts can keep issuing nationwide injunctions—and things got tense. 🔥 In theory, this case was about reining in judges who block federal policies coast to coast. https://t.co/ICtvsQL5XR
The Supreme Court isn’t keen on Donald Trump’s birthright citizenship order—the puzzle is how to block it. We explain the three paths the justices could take https://t.co/qRdTRmym5D Photo: Getty Images https://t.co/QyOAoaVK5d
In all the universal/nationwide injunctions debate almost no one (including SCOTUS) has said anything about state & local governments. That’s terribly unfortunate because UIs are needed in suits against them the most, as I explain here. 1/ 🧵 https://t.co/2LIqB06NKb