The National Herald case, involving allegations of money laundering against Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, is currently being heard at the Rouse Avenue Court in Delhi. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has presented arguments opposing the accused's contentions, highlighting issues such as lack of transparency in company shares and transactions, and the use of fake names as part of an alleged conspiracy. Sonia Gandhi's counsel, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, described the ED's case as "strange," noting that no money exchange, property transfer, or asset movement has occurred in the case. Congress leader Supriya Shrinate echoed this view, emphasizing the unusual nature of the money laundering charges. The court has scheduled the next hearing for July 12, where the Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju will continue with the ED's arguments. Meanwhile, the case has attracted commentary from various political spokespersons and legal experts during televised debates. The proceedings are ongoing with the ED seeking to substantiate its allegations against the accused Congress leaders.
National Herald case: ED opposes arguments of accused persons https://t.co/4LrdEA2ORi
The #EnforcementDirectorate on Tuesday opposed the contention of the accused persons who concluded their arguments in the National Herald case. https://t.co/Td4BuLr8Xw
#UPDATE In the National Herald money laundering case, Enforcement Directorate (ED) stated that the company’s shares and transactions lacked transparency and involved the use of fake names as part of a conspiracy. ED presented its arguments today and will continue and conclude its https://t.co/Am8cB07WIu