The Superior Chamber of Mexico's Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary (TEPJF) has dismissed the majority of challenges against 17 judicial election contests, including those involving the Supreme Court. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to support claims that "acordeones"—candidates allegedly promoted unfairly—had a real impact on the election results. Additionally, the TEPJF confirmed the ineligibility of three winning judicial candidates for failing to meet the minimum undergraduate grade average requirement of 8. The National Electoral Institute (INE) imposed financial sanctions on numerous judicial candidates primarily for lack of transparency in their resource reporting. Various political commentators have expressed concerns about the authenticity and fairness of the judicial election process, highlighting issues such as opacity in campaign financing and systemic political problems within legislative structures.